My PR
Itinerary · 10Intermediate8 min read

Plan your week: volume, progression and down weeks

How much volume, how to split it, how much to add each week, and what the evidence actually says about the famous 10% rule.


A training week is not a list of favourite sessions: it is a distribution of load between what stimulates and what allows recovery. Two decisions determine almost everything: how much you run in total, and how much of that load is hard.

How much volume

ProfileDays/weekIndicative volumeQuality sessions
Starting out315–25 km0–1 (hills or fartlek)
Habitual runner430–45 km1–2
10K / half target545–65 km2
Marathon target5–660–90 km2 (one inside the long run)
Indicative. The volume you can sustain without niggles matters more than the one in the table.

The usual distribution — and the one elite practice describes — is most of the time at low intensity and a small fraction at high intensity, without setting up camp in the middle zone (zones and intensity).

How much to add each week

What the evidence saysLimited evidence

The 10% rule is not validated; what does show up is the risk of big jumps

A systematic review on load changes and injury concluded the evidence is conflicting and that the popular 10% rule was never validated in a trial. What several studies do find is higher risk when the increase is large: runners who raised their weekly distance by more than 30% had more injuries than those who stayed below 10%.

How to translate that

You do not need to be a slave to a percentage. Build up gradually, avoid big jumps, and change one variable at a time: either more kilometres or more intensity, never both in the same week.

  1. 1

    Three weeks up, one down

    A common pattern: +5–10% of volume for three consecutive weeks and a fourth 30–40% lower, keeping some intensity so you do not go flat.

  2. 2

    Count the time, not just the kilometres

    If you run in the mountains or change pace a lot, time on feet describes the load better than distance.

  3. 3

    Adjust from the real week, not the planned one

    If you slept badly or did half the plan, next week starts from what you did, not from what was written.

A typical 4-day week

DaySessionIntensity
MondayRest or strength
TuesdayEasy run 45 min + 4 stridesZ1
WednesdayTempo: 3 × 10 min with 2 min easyZ2
ThursdayRest or strength
FridayEasy run 40 minZ1
SaturdayIntervals: 5 × 4 min, 2 min recoveryZ3
SundayLong run 75–100 minZ1
Leave at least 48 h between the two hard sessions and never put quality the day after the long run.

Living with the gym

What the evidence saysModerate evidence

Training strength and running together does not ruin strength gains

An updated systematic review with meta-analysis on concurrent training (43 studies) did not find that adding aerobic work compromises maximal strength or hypertrophy; a small negative effect does appear on explosive strength. Interference grows with aerobic volume and with how close the sessions are.

  • If you can, separate strength and running by at least 6 hours, or put them on different days.
  • If they fall on the same day, do whatever is the priority in that cycle first.
  • A strength session sits better on the same day as a running quality session than the day before a long run.

Takeaways

  • Pick a volume you can repeat three weeks running without niggles.
  • Change one variable at a time and avoid big jumps in mileage.
  • Every 3–4 weeks, a down week with 30–40% less volume.
  • 48 h between hard sessions; the long run never has quality the day after.
  • Strength fits in the week without sacrificing the running.

Sources for this chapter

  1. [1]Damsted C, Glad S, Nielsen RO, Sørensen H, Malisoux L (2018). Is there evidence for an association between changes in training load and running-related injuries? A systematic review. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. review
  2. [2]Nielsen RO, Parner ET, Nohr EA, Sørensen H, Lind M, Rasmussen S (2014). Excessive progression in weekly running distance and risk of running-related injuries: an association which varies according to type of injury. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. trial
  3. [3]Schumann M, Feuerbacher JF, Sünkeler M, et al. (2022). Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine. meta-analysis
  4. [4]Seiler S (2010). What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes?. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. review