What a supplement can and cannot do
The real order of magnitude: how much a supplement adds next to training, eating and sleeping. And why that order decides where the money should go.
The supplement industry sells a comfortable story: that some tub closes the gap between what you do and what you would like to get. The evidence tells a less marketable and far more useful one: a handful of products genuinely work, they work a little, and they only work once everything underneath is already in place.
This guide treats supplements as what they are: the top layer of a stack. Before looking at any product it is worth knowing how thick that layer is.
The hierarchy, in proportion
This is not a motivational metaphor: it is the rough share of the outcome attributable to each lever in someone who trains seriously. Supplements exist, they count, and they are the small slice.
Supplements are a marginal add-on to a base that already works
The International Olympic Committee consensus statement on supplements is explicit: a few products can improve performance by a small but meaningful amount in athletes who already have diet and training sorted, and no supplement compensates for an energy deficit, a poor diet or a bad plan. The Australian Institute of Sport framework gets there another way: it sorts the whole catalogue into four groups, and only group A — five or six products — has enough backing for competitive use.
1-3% is nothing and everything, depending on who you are
In a 3:30 marathon, 2% is four minutes: for an amateur runner that is a personal best. In someone who has been training three times a week for two months, that same 2% is invisible next to what is still on the table from fixing the plan and the food. Same product, same effect, two different decisions.
Four questions before you buy
They work for any product, including ones released after this was written. If any of them answers no, the rest are moot.
- 1
Is the base sorted?
Weekly volume per muscle and progression (training variables), calories that match the goal (how many you need), protein covered and sleep. Buying before that is paying for the 3% while ignoring the 50%.
- 2
Is there evidence in humans, training, at the dose in the tub?
Most claims come from studies in cells, in rats, or at doses ten times what the product contains. A plausible mechanism is not a measured effect.
- 3
Does it happen to people like me?
Many effects only show up in specific populations: people deficient in a nutrient, vegetarians, women low on iron, over-60s. Outside those groups the average effect is usually zero.
- 4
What does the effective dose cost per month?
Not the tub: the daily dose the studies used, for as long as they used it. That is the calculation that eliminates half the catalogue without arguing about physiology.
What a supplement is and is not
Legally, in the European Union a food supplement is food, not medicine. That has two big consequences worth having clear before reading any label.
- Efficacy does not have to be proven before selling. A medicine goes through clinical trials and an authorisation; a food supplement does not. What is regulated is what it may say: health claims must be on the European register, evaluated by EFSA. That is why labels talk in circles.
- The contents do not have to be proven either. Control is after the fact and by sampling, not before and by batch. Hence the chapter on quality and contamination, which in this guide is not an appendix.
- A supplement is not a substitute. A protein shake, a carbohydrate drink or a gel are food in a convenient format; they count inside the day’s calories and compete with the rest of the plate, they are not free.
What no supplement fixes
Eating below what you burn on a sustained basis — what the IOC calls relative energy deficiency in sport — degrades bone, hormones, immune function and performance at once. Nothing in this guide compensates for that: the answer is eating more, not supplementing better.
How this guide is organised
Criteria first, then products by family, and the buying decision last. Each chapter stands alone, but this order is the one that saves money.
- Fundamentals
- What to expect · What actually works · Quality and labels
- Protein and amino acids
- Protein types · Amino acids
- Performance
- Creatine · Caffeine · For running
- Health and buying
- Vitamins and minerals · What does not work · How to buy
The framework: how much a supplement can move, and what a tub guarantees.
The best-selling family and the most misunderstood.
The ones with a measured effect, with their doses and their limits.
The part that is not about performance, and the final decision.
This is education, not an individual protocol
With a diagnosed condition, chronic medication, pregnancy or breastfeeding, any supplementation should be cleared by a healthcare professional. Several products in this guide interact with common medicines. Nothing here replaces that consultation.
Takeaways
- The ceiling for a supplement that works is on the order of 1-5% of the outcome.
- That margin only appears once training, energy, protein and sleep are already sorted.
- A food supplement proves neither efficacy nor contents before it is sold: the label promises less than it looks like.
- Four questions — base, human evidence, population, cost per dose — rule out almost the entire catalogue.
Sources for this chapter
- [1]Maughan RJ, Burke LM, Dvorak J, et al. (2018). IOC consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. British Journal of Sports Medicine. position stand
- [2]Australian Institute of Sport (2025). AIS Sports Supplement Framework: clasificación ABCD de suplementos. Australian Institute of Sport. official guideline
- [3]Kerksick CM, Wilborn CD, Roberts MD, et al. (2018). ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. position stand
- [4]Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM (2016). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. position stand
- [5]European Food Safety Authority (2026). Declaraciones de propiedades saludables: dictámenes y registro de la UE. EFSA. official guideline
- [6]Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al. (2023). 2023 International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine. position stand